Arch vs ubuntu for gaming Again largely a myth. The benefit of those custom kernals are pretty laughable in my book. 6 days ago · With access to the Arch User Repository (AUR), you can easily install gaming tools like Steam, Lutris, and Wine. Garuda is pretty close to Nobara in features if you want an Arch based gaming distro, its fully stocked software wise, but is a medium performer, but faster Dec 18, 2023 · Garuda Linux has earned quite a reputation in the Linux gaming world and rightfully so, thanks to the OS featuring built-in packages that help you get started with gaming on Linux out of the box. I will say you should use the Nvidia PPA if you are going the Ubuntu (or Mint/Ubuntu derivative) route because the Nvidia drivers that come with Ubuntu by default are older and not great for Optimus (in my experience, YMMV) Linux gaming is advancing rapidly, including performance-wise. After looking more into it I am on the fence between Arch and Mint. Maybe 5-10% of those you might need to mess around with proton/wine versions for a couple minutes, but it's so much easier than it was just half a decade ago. IF you know what you're doing, and you're willing to put in the time, Arch can be leaner and faster and be wholly "up to date. Some games run rather poorly with the compositor enabled, and/or aren't able to trigger the OS to automatically disable it in full-screen, so it can be useful to have a shortcut to manually control it. All this place talks about it seems is distro vs distro. Also in point of gaming, Arch offers a lot of possibility. Much like Arch, Garuda is a rolling release, and besides the gaming goodies, most people like the way it looks. Okay so I made an earlier post saying I would be switching from windows 11 to arch. If you want a easy starting point with arch, I would advice to use EndeavourOS. As for lastest drivers- I don't even bother upgrading anymore. See full list on dekisoft. Pop!_OS (Ubuntu/Deb based) has AMD/Intel or Nvidia-specific releases that just work out of the box for steam gaming - at least in my experience with an RTX-3050Ti running on Arch vs Pop. The main reason I jumped from Ubuntu to Majaro was for gaming, Ubuntu ends up way too far behind when it comes to the Kernel version and compiling things is a nightmare when 64bit and 32bit libs come into play. Ubuntu moves between discrete releases every 6 months, whereas Arch is a rolling-release system. I think it would be nice if they separated the non-free software into a repository that had to be turned on manually the way Fedora does. Typically Ubuntu vs Manjaro. Jan 2, 2024 · Are you having difficulty in choosing between Arch Linux and Ubuntu as OS? We have a detailed comparison on Performance, Gaming and Programming aspects. When comparing Ubuntu vs Arch Linux, the Slant community recommends Arch Linux for most people. besides, fedora is not meant to be used as a desktop operating system. The most important reason people chose Arch Linux is: Fedora is comparable to Ubuntu in terms of stability, and while not bleeding edge like Arch, tends to be not that far behind. Im currently testing gaming on Arch vs Debian bullseye, struggling to see any difference in game performance. It's great for gaming, and while it's a rolling release and is more up-to-date than Ubuntu and other fixed releases, the packages are delayed quite a bit vs other rolling releases, eg Arch, Endeavour, Tumbleweed, etc. The distro is based off Ubuntu LTS releases. -OR- If you want Arch-based, EndeavourOS. Fedora and Arch have the latest kernels, that's all. And that software is months (or years) more up to date on Arch, as well. The advantages of Arch for gaming is that every new development for gaming, such as when the futex2 patches came out are immediately available. Manjaro is a good platform to learn how things are done in Ubuntu vs Arch performance? I've ran both systems over the years but I can't remember much of my arch system other than it took ages to configure it all. I prefer openSUSE Tumbleweed for rolling release and Fedora for a shorter cycle regular release, other than Arch, those two are the best distros for gaming and most things in my opinion. Clear Linux For Intel Steam Gaming Performance https: If you are on Arch (based) you can try adding Valve's repo and installing Same here. community) but also some Reddit threads pointed at Kubuntu as their preferred choice because users feel the KDE desktop environment is a lightweight option to improve the gaming experience. I use to run Debian-based distros & am currently running EndeavourOS (last 1. So as you prolly know, ive been wanting to switch to linux for gaming after seeing how garbage and slow windows 10 is, only problem is that i dont know wether to go with arch or debian. Arch is the best distribution for gaming there is. com. openSUSE vs. There's stable vs latest software, but stable vs fast updates is a false dichotomy. In the question“What are the best Linux distributions for desktops?” Arch Linux is ranked 1st while Pop!_OS is ranked 16th. com Dec 1, 2023 · ComputerBase benchmarked three different Linux operating systems and found that all three can achieve better gaming performance than Windows 11. Kubuntu. So I am a new Arch user, but let me tell you why I have chosen Arch. One is essentially static, from one release to the next, while one is rolling. Im extremely familiar with both as ive been using linux for other stuff for 7 years. Like how Ubuntu packages their distro on top of Debian, Manjaro is based on Arch but packages their distro independent of Arch. Unless I'm effected by a bug that gets addressed (haven't yet) I haven't seen any benefit whatsoever. Updating is as stable as it gets on Arch and update speed depends on your internet connection, unless you're compiling. I don't intend to ever change distros. And Steam has opened up an Arch-specific repo at repo. FYI Arch can have a DE just like any other distro and there is no such thing as stable vs fast updates. . Jul 15, 2023 · Performance Showdown: Arch Linux vs Ubuntu. Not just limited to our forums (itsfoss. Dec 1, 2023 · ComputerBase benchmarked three different Linux operating systems and found that all three can achieve better gaming performance than Windows 11. Personal I like the documentation of Arch. If you want a Linux that you can install quickly and will give you an easy introduction to Linux, Ubuntu beats Arch hands down. Fedora vs. Dec 23, 2023 · Arch Linux and Fedora have different installation processes, with Fedora being easier for first-time users and Arch requiring more research and knowledge. Features: Rolling release model for the latest software and drivers. Apr 28, 2022 · There are several reasons to recommend Arch-based (or rolling) distros over Ubuntu, but the most important one is if someone has new hardware, because it almost certainly won't even work in Ubuntu at all, to where you won't even be able to install Ubuntu at all. There are several reasons to recommend Arch-based (or rolling) distros over Ubuntu, but the most important one is if someone has new hardware, because it almost certainly won't even work in Ubuntu at all, to where you won't even be able to install Ubuntu at all. Plus, its KDE Plasma desktop is highly customizable and optimized for gaming. Fedora? I'm aware of Ubuntu having slightly older Kernel or Mesa than Pop, but I believe the differences shouldn't be too big (<5%), and still, those end up reaching Ubuntu too (or you can just pick a PPA). They are quite close to vanilla arch but they include some minor addons to make your life easier installing/maintaining your arch installation. What Arch teaches you is (1) how to install Arch, (2) how to cope with problems in AUR that is maintained by amateurs in their free time and does not track the base Arch changes, and (3) how to cope with the many programs available as Debian package that are not in AUR. a lot of people claim fedora is easier, but compared to arch, fedora is not that much easier tbh, you have to set up dnf to not be hellish slow, install media codecs, enable dozens of repos and whatnot. There will be missing or disagreement between packages if you install Manjaro; arch-wiki-doc, an offline arch wiki document, is not available from Manjaro. Let's dive into the heart of the matter: the performance showdown between Arch Linux and Ubuntu. Arch offers a ports-like package build system and the Arch User Repository, where users can share source packages for the pacman package manager. if i wanted out of the box experience and easy maintenance, i'd use ubuntu. " But if you don't put Dec 1, 2023 · The three Linux operating systems ComputerBase benchmarked are Arch Linux, with several designed for gaming. Access to the Arch User Repository (AUR) for additional gaming tools. For this reason, Arch has a long and hard learning curve, but every energy, that put in the system, with a lot of patience, it is possible with Arch to reach the personal goal. It's essentially vanilla arch with a graphical installer. The downsides to it are that the repos update to whatever the software project says their next release is ready. I also use Arch on a private server for 9 months and I recently installed Arch on my laptop (used for work while home office and for gaming). Before publishing this article, I asked for suggestions for favorite Linux distributions for gaming. There is nothing wrong with Ubuntu, per se, I just prefer newer packages and I dislike the non-LTS Ubuntu releases. Jan 23, 2022 · The advantages of Arch for gaming is that every new development for gaming, such as when the futex2 patches came out are immediately available. Fedora supports more hardware architectures than Arch Linux, offering better hardware compatibility out of the box. And with the plethora of offshoots that are merely GUI installer and some packaging + couple tools to make life easier it's not hard to be on Arch anymore, either, further that the pace of development for gaming on Linux outstrips that of non rolling and backports don't happen nearly often or fast enough, so for gaming generally find Arch to be the most reliable results and stability. Arch Linux has a faster package manager called Pacman, while Fedora uses DNF. It works flawlessly running Hogwarts Legacy with med-high settings and no crashes, stutters, or weird OOM errors that I experienced in Arch and EndeavourOS (on Ubuntu LTS will be fine for gaming. One is Debian/Ubuntu-based, one isn't. Fedora also happens to be a testbed for RHEL, so it tends to be amongst the first to establish or switch to new standards, like BTRFS or Wayland. However instead of opting for the kernel from Ubuntu, Drauger uses the mainline Linux kernel. steampowered. Arch is an independent, community-driven project with no commercial agenda. I have worries that it hasn’t all the apps because it’s based on Arch and not Ubuntu. This will be my main home machine for music, web browsing, video consumption, school work, and very light gaming. As someone who uses Linux full time for well over a decade and arch for most of that, the current state of gaming outside of competitive online games is that 98% of the time it works. Nov 1, 2023 · 3. And all the components that make up the Linux gaming ecosystem and their dependencies are what makes that possible, so of course you want the most up-to-date libraries/packages. PoP!_OS is a Ubuntu-based operating system built by System76 that features Steam I would suggest you take a look at EndeavourOS--It's mostly Arch with a GUI installer--the forum is friendly & there is a Gaming questions section. The most important reason people chose Arch Linux is: All will be suitable for gaming (as much as Ubuntu is suitable for gaming). It's about how smoothly your system runs, how efficiently it uses resources Holoiso is the fastest arch based distro for gaming with cachyos coming in a close second, but since holoiso is using the steamOS 3 interface I would not recomend it with an Nvidia card. This is actually hilarious. May 16, 2020 · When comparing Arch Linux vs Pop!_OS, the Slant community recommends Arch Linux for most people. Ubuntu vs. it's the test zone for red hat where they test Generally any distro is perfectly fine for gaming. With KDE Plasma there's a default shortcut for disabling the compositor, at least on X11 (Alt+Shift+F12), but I am not aware if there's something similar on Gnome. In the question“What are the best Linux distributions for desktops?” Arch Linux is ranked 1st while Ubuntu is ranked 23rd. We will explore Debian vs Arch for gaming, debian vs arch minecraft including a comparison of how each handles popular titles like Minecraft, as well as examining Debian vs Arch performance across various tasks. Is for my understanding one of the best in case of gnu/Linux. Sep 28, 2023 · Drauger OS describes itself as a Linux Desktop Gaming OS. arch: PROS: minimalist fast lots of packages (AUR) works ok with Nvidia here to stay cool logo kernel is whatever you want CONS: unstable( system update is Russian roulette) nothing "just works" or is made for you (tweaking is always required) gaming performance is unstable (sometimes games become slow for 0 reason) feels like its held together Gaming on arch is possible but as you said is not have same popularity than ubuntu and derivates distributions and this make easy find information or tools for many problems (example: ppa and other things) Has anyone found any significant performance differnece between Pop vs Ubuntu or, let's say Nobara vs. One is pretty much predicated on using Gnome, the other lets you choose you DE. I used Ubuntu for many years and I still use it at work (desktop and servers). My personal recommendations are Fedora Workstation or Nobara (Nobara is Fedora but with gaming optimizations OOTB, maintained by GloriousEggroll). Apr 27, 2019 · Arch Linux also does not take a philosophical stance on software, and includes proprietary software in the core repositories without an opt-in feature. 5 years)--works well--I like a rolling distro & it fits the bill nicely. My main issue is Ubuntu 18 is a bit slow on start up and parsing files etc, so I'm curious if an Arch system would give me significant speed increase thats worth the effort. If you buy a brand-new bleeding edge machine with the latest hardware Fedora and Arch should be able to take advantage of all it's capacity whilst Debian might not be able to because Debian Stable isn't running the current kernel. When it comes to the arch linux vs ubuntu performance debate, it's essential to remember that performance isn't just about speed. Nov 30, 2024 · Whether you are a developer, gamer, or system administrator, the debate between Debian vs Arch is one that continues to spark interest. These were how we answered differently. Plain ubuntu will be just as good as either of them, dont get taking in by gaming tags, they ultimately run on the same tech, using same drivers, whatever minor tweaks they have are available on other platforms. It is on same level of ease-of-installation as ubuntu or Pop. Arch has wayyyyyyy more software than Mint, and especially when it comes to gaming. Mar 6, 2023 · Arch vs Ubuntu: Who Wins? The distribution that's right for you is best decided by what you want from your Linux. pscsosuiaszjcgaxbmyvvnwqqnfdebzkwbfddkktmxmslxlyuiq