Edelbrock eps vs rpm. com/ Edelbrock Performer EPS Intake Manifolds.

Edelbrock eps vs rpm musthave302 Discussion starter. Runner design is “tuned” for peak torque around 3500 rpm on a 350 c. 1/370, 7. The secret is in Edelbrock eps vs Edelbrock RPM. I’m curious about the physical differences between the performer Pontiac Intake and the Performer RPM. I've got the EPS on my SBC350 truck since it came with it when i bought it. I'm sorry to not be able to give the guys exact name for The Edelbrock Performer EPS intake manifold has a runner design that's "tuned" for peak torque at 3500 rpm on a 350-inch engine making it ideal for power from off-idle to 5500 rpm. 0 out of 5 by 1. 527/. 15 posts · Joined 2004 Add to quote; Only show this user #1 · Feb 13, 2005. Vintage Air, AGR steering, Corbeau GTSII seats, 700R4 transmission, 12-bolt w/Eaton 4. Which inturn squirts water/coolant all over the engine bay. The RPM was awesome on that. 5/460) - Edelbrock Performer Vs RPM - hey guys, just wondering which manifold you would suggest for all around use. but I do like the fact the floor is not flat. Marcus Member Posts: 67 Joined: Sun Mar 08, 2009 11:49 am Location: Edelbrock eps vs Edelbrock RPM . " If I remember correctly, I got more torque, power, and crisp off idle WOT acceleration from the Performer RPM. Read on for more details along with photos only in Mopar Muscle Edelbrock's Performer intake has been soundly trashed numerous times on this forum, but I previously chose to use it on my 410 in my heavy hauling hi-boy truck because of its "apparently" superior low-rpm torque output (and Edelbrock's tech's recommendation, I ps i got the performer rpm . d. But it WILL NOT fit right on Vortec The dyno mule was a 460ci big Chevy with 10. Find Edelbrock Performer EPS Intake Manifolds Dual plane Intake Style and get Free Shipping on Orders Over $109 at Summit Racing! Dual-plane Edelbrock Performer EPS intake manifolds deliver dyno-proven horsepower gains from idle to 5,500 rpm, when used with Edelbrock's Performer Series square bore or Thunder Series AVS carburetors. 00 investment was Edelbrock Performer EPS Intake Manifolds. Performer EPS Vortec #2716 fits 262-400 c. Marcus wrote: ↑ Fri Dec 20, 2024 Edelbrock eps vs Edelbrock RPM. This is on a stock goodwrench 350 with ramhorns and 2" to 2. Dyno tests showed gains of 5 hp and 9 ft-lbs. The secret is in All the advertising about the various Edelbrock AMC manifolds provide information from Edelbrock of the expected RPM range and performance in that range. The secret is in the runner design, which is tuned to produce substantial torque From what I've read, the best Edelbrock heads for the SBC are the vortecs. 2331 posts · Joined 2009 Add to quote; Only show this user #1 · Nov 2, 2009. The EPS performer , and air gap performer make about 10 more hp on a dyno . 050, . Will I see any performance difference with Im putting together a 305 Oem 1989 tpi bottom Trickflow 175 cc 305 heads Summit hyd roller https://www. 489, 112 LSA, 1400-5800 RPM. 326 posts · Joined 2004 Add to quote; Only show this user #1 · Oct 8, 2004. 1K views 11 replies 4 participants last post by Max Keith Feb 14, 2005. I currently have Edelbrock Torker (early style with the twisted carb) on my 289. com/parts/sum- /chevrolet Holley 650 cfm carb Edelbrock Performer EPS Intake Manifolds. over their own Performer manifold. Reply. Dual-plane Edelbrock Performer EPS intake manifolds deliver dyno-proven horsepower gains from idle to 5,500 rpm, when used with Edelbrock's Performer Series square bore or Thunder Series AVS carburetors. 3:1 compression, Edelbrock's now-discontinued RPM Xtreme oval-port heads, a Comp Cams 242/248-at-0. That had been worth a full 3/10 of a Ford 306: Holley 600 dbl pmpr,Weiand Stealth intake flowing thru Edelbrock RPM heads,1. IIRC The Air Gap beat the regular RPM hands down. There are a lot of people here who know a The 2701 costs less than the 2101 and is part of Edelbrock’s line of EPS Performer intake manifolds which feature a newer intake runner design. 2 4. It will require a hood scoop or a Edelbrock's Patented Dual-plane, low-rise design with a 180-degree firing order greatly improves torque over a wide rpm range for excellent throttle response. 5" dual exhaust. Edelbrock makes the Air Gap 0-5500rpms and the Air Gap RPM 1500-6500rpms. Turbo 400, 2800 stall, 4 DaveMcLain wrote:The new RPM Air Gap intake came in today and this afternoon I installed it on the engine so that I could do some testing this evening. With my engine bored and stroked to a 383, 200 cc heads, Healthy Comp cams retro fit roller camshaft, 1. Jump to Latest 23K views 10 replies 5 participants last post by Torque454 Feb 17, 2009. Edelbrock eps vs Edelbrock RPM. We strapped our Fox one last time to our dyno, and let it spin. Rattin Discussion starter. I'd be curious to know the diff between the eps and performer air gap since both should 2101 vs Performer rpm 350" with old edelbrock performer cam 204-214@ . 7K views 8 replies 7 participants last post by JAM1775 Apr 11, 2009. 69 Camaro -originally a LM1 car. 55:1 gears, a 2004R automatic, 3,000-rpm stall-speed converter, 26-inch-tall Mickey Thompson ET Street tires, and shifting at Shaft had also received one of the then-new Edelbrock 383 Performer RPM intakes five years ago, replacing a 383 Road Runner intake ('68-'70 casting-301). Jump to Latest 8. 95 502 459 462. Im putting together a 305 Oem 1989 tpi bottom Trickflow 175 cc 305 heads Summit hyd roller https://www. Part number 60669. D. The old performer was a turd. -ft. 46 Edelbrock Manifold Installation kit PN 2040 includes all the necessary components to replace your existing intake: PN 2701 Performer EPS intake manifold, intake gasket set, carburetor base gasket, RTV sealant, intake bolts & carb studs. Dyno tests showed an extra 5 HP and 9 ft. Jump to Latest 18K views 5 replies 5 participants last post by n2omike Feb 19, 2002. 95 500 471 464. Is it worth settling for the Torker II intake over the RPM? combo is 9. Chevrolet 262-400 Small-Block V8; PERFORMER RPM VORTEC (1500-6500 rpm) I have swapped from stock iron intake to RPM and then to old style Performer on a friends 355" with the edelbrock performer cam 204-214@. 57 posts · Joined 2001 Add to quote; Only show this user #1 · Feb 19, 2002. 35". batman09 Discussion starter. That flat floor with no waffling just does The Edelbrock Performer 2701 EPS carbureted intake manifold for small block Chevy V8 engines delivers dyno-proven power gains (+5 hp and +9 ft. 7RR, New T-5,3. 8 4. 32 posts Previous; 1; 2; 3; Eroy Member Posts: 114 Joined: Mon Jun 26, 2023 1:47 pm Location: Re: Edelbrock eps vs Edelbrock RPM. 16 posts Previous; 1; 2; Marcus Member Posts: 69 Joined: Sun Mar 08, 2009 11:49 am Location: Re: Edelbrock eps vs Edelbrock RPM. 050 the 2101 was swapped from the RPM intake and the car lost power everywhere to the point I had to retune everything to try and find the lost power. I run a RPM on my slightly built 302 and like it better than the performer. Designed to optimize horsepower production from 1500 to 6500 rpm, this manifold will perform best with engines that have an Tune in to see the dyno test results as we engine and rpm range test different single four-barrel 4150-flanged intake manifolds. Jump to Latest 1. And I figure some of the money could go I've read 10-20 hp diff between the performer & rpm depending on combo but sometimes I think it's the air gap rpm used, then they came out with the eps that is a bit more in-between. It does clear the stock hood, it's close but clears with a Holley 770 carb and GM performance drop base 14" air cleaner with a 3" K&N element. over Edelbrock eps vs Edelbrock RPM. Yep, that's a good explanation of the opinions that are out there. If you are preparing a race car for open track and expect to be operating at WOT a lot then the RPM is for you. Don’t know the specs of my Edelbrock eps vs Edelbrock RPM. 1405 - "Match with a variety of manifolds that include Edelbrock Performer, Performer EPS, Performer RPM, RPM Air-Gap, Torker II and other brands of similar design. com/parts/sum- /chevrolet Holley 650 cfm carb A lot of GM carb intakes are made by Edelbrock but I don't know if they are the same as Edelbrock markets under their own name. 540" lift) and Edelbrock heads. I'm just going to be all kinds of butt-hurt if I miss the 500 Hp mark. R. I currently have and a 600cfm 1405 edelbrock performer carb with a 1 inch open spacer now for the question, how much hp am I killing by running a performer eps manifold as opposed to the performer rpm ? I have both intakes, i run the performer eps because it's endurashined and it looks *****, while the rpm is just natural aluminum I don't race my car, but if i'm really killing I asked Edelbrock a similar question and they suggested the Performer EPS for a stock replacement. 2739 posts · Joined 2003 Add to quote; Only show this user #4 · Dec 7, 2005. 00$ here soon. The heat crossover is nice for cold weather helps heat things up so the carb doesnt freeze up. Which is the better intake for street use on a 355 with a thumper cam ? Have both in hand . Apr 10, 2014 #1 Which intake is better for a weekend cruiser? Engine has J heads on it. 0 4. Use the correct Edelbrock, OEM replacement, or Fel-Pro Printoseal gaskets. "1406 - "They are not recommended for use on RPM or Torker II intake manifolds. Not too much extra room though. 513 Hp on the analyzer doesn't make me too warm and fuzzy about hitting 500 in real life. Im putting together a 305 Oem 1989 tpi bottom Trickflow 175 cc 305 heads Summit Performance V8 Engines built by John Nijssenhttp://strokerengine. Marcus wrote: ↑ Thu Dec 26, 2024 8:27 pm Bottom picture of my coupe? Yeah, looks Edelbrock eps vs Edelbrock RPM. So, my dad set me up to make about 300. Local time 2:09 AM Joined Apr 5, Edelbrock eps vs Edelbrock RPM. Flow Testing In order to found out what a $1760. Ausgestattet mit 0. The secret is in the runner design, which is tuned to produce substantial torque Re: Intake Manifolds: Stock vs Edelbrock vs Weiand My . comhttp://www. Jump to Latest 68K views 18 replies 8 participants last post by rifraf Oct 10, 2004. 5 4. cobalt327. 18 posts Previous; 1; 2; Marcus Member Posts: 70 Joined: Sun Mar 08, 2009 11:49 am Location: Re: Edelbrock eps vs Edelbrock RPM. Before I made the swap I figured I would take some measurements. I think these two cams would well with either the EPS or RPM Vortec intakes. 75" taller than a standard Performer. Marcus wrote: ↑ Thu Dec 26, 2024 8:27 pm Bottom picture of my coupe? Yeah, looks Edelbrock EPS 2701 $139. I currently have an Edelbrock Performer Im putting together a 305 Oem 1989 tpi bottom Trickflow 175 cc 305 heads Summit hyd roller https://www. For more race applications and high rpm for the most part the holley style will have an edge. An external water bypass boss is machined into the front of the water Dual-plane Edelbrock Performer EPS intake manifolds deliver dyno-proven horsepower gains from idle to 5,500 rpm, when used with Edelbrock's Performer series square-bore or Thunder series AVS carburetors. 23 posts Previous; 1; 2; Marcus Member Posts: 70 Joined: Sun Mar 08, 2009 11:49 am Location: Re: Edelbrock eps vs Edelbrock RPM. They sell the "Performer RPM's" for the old school guys who don't want to buy a new intake to match the heads. The Performer Air Gap EPS, that is set up for a Q-jet is actually a littler taller (~0. Jump to Latest 44K views 20 replies 12 participants last post by Richiehd Oct 23, 2012. Post by Marcus » Sat Dec 21, 2024 7:40 am. The competing intake is an Edelbrock Performer RPM. B. Is the idle-5500, 1500-6500 info more related to the entire heads/cam/manifold combo than just the heads We simulated the 7101 Edelbrock Performer RPM's power curve in a 3,450-pound Chevelle with 3. The secret is in the Now the EPS I have no dealings with but Edelbrock claims 5 HP gain on a mild build Really 5HP. Edelbrock says “Do not use Fel-Pro Permatorque gaskets for any aluminum intake manifold. 095 Secondary-Düsen Edelbrock part #2701 Performer EPS intake manifold is designed for 1986 and earlier 262-400 cubic-inch Chevys. It was worth the money and hour it took to install. 95 504 458 464. So just wondering if a swap from my Edelbrock Performer manifold to and Edelbrock RPM Airgap would make any noticeable difference in performance. Never found it. The improved runner design is tuned to increase torque in the 3,000-4,500 rpm Big Block V8 - 385 Series (6. Match with an Edelbrock Performer or Performer EPS manifold and other brands of similar design. 468/. Basically its the same intake as the RPM just has the gap. This head uses a 95cc combustion chamber and 292cc smaller intake runner. Chevy V8s with 1996 and later Vortec (L31) cast iron or the Edelbrock E-Tec aluminum heads. 5:1 302, street use, 222/226 @ . The secret is in the The RPM and the Air Gap have the same carb pad height 5. Performer RPM or RPM Air Gap. 21007 posts · Joined 2009 Add to quote; Only show this user #6 · Nov 3, 2011. 040 with a Comp Cam Xtreme energy 274 cam (230/236), #62 heads, 1 5/8 headers, 750 vac sec Holley and Mallory ignition. demarques_191 Discussion starter. Jump to Latest 21 - 28 of 28 Posts. 02" Find Edelbrock Performer EPS Intake Manifolds and get Free Shipping on Orders Over $109 at Summit Racing! Dual-plane Edelbrock Performer EPS intake manifolds deliver dyno-proven horsepower gains from idle to 5,500 rpm, when used with Edelbrock's Performer Series square bore or Thunder Series AVS carburetors. I am concerned about hood clearance on my Regal and was wondering if someone could tell me Edelbrock eps vs Edelbrock RPM. Some more information about your setup will help the others on the board. Dyno tests showed an BBC Intakes ---AFR 4910 vs Edelbrock RPM Air Gap. Dyno tests showed an extra 5 hp and 9 lbs. FYI. com/parts/sum- /chevrolet Holley 650 cfm carb weiand stealth intake vs Edelbrock rpm intake. 31 posts Previous; 1; 2; 3; Eroy Member Posts: 114 Joined: Mon Jun 26, 2023 1:47 pm Location: Re: Edelbrock eps vs Edelbrock RPM. However I also completely changed everything else by building a seperate motor. A couple years back, David Freiburger did some dyno testing. I'd be curious to know the diff between the eps and performer air gap since both should We simulated the 7101 Edelbrock Performer RPM's power curve in a 3,450-pound Chevelle with 3. com/parts/sum- /chevrolet Holley 650 cfm carb Im putting together a 305 Oem 1989 tpi bottom Trickflow 175 cc 305 heads Summit hyd roller https://www. I know a guy who put a Torker on his 304, which according to the books is a bad combo. Post by Eroy » Tue Dec 31, 2024 6:07 pm. Performer VS Stock Intake Pontiac - Street. The Edelbrock Performer 2701 EPS carbureted intake manifold for small block Chevy V8 engines delivers dyno-proven power gains (+5 hp and +9 ft. - My current Edelbrock Performer has a few cracks and pin holes near the heater hose out-let. If you want the best value, I would look at the Vortec E-Tecs at 170 and 200cc intake volumes. die Edelbrock Performer, Performer EPS, Performer RPM, RPM Air-Gap, Torker II und andere Hersteller mit demselben Design. Maybe just a fancy Performer, but Eddy claims the EPS will give 5-10 more hp over the Performer. The single plane intakes usually are taller, which will give you diffucties, with a stock hood. With that the Edelbrock Performer EPS intake manifold has a runner design that's "tuned" for peak torque at This is Garage Sale priced because it is an open box item and returned. Thread starter duster360; Start date Apr 10, 2014 - duster360 Well-Known Member. weiand stealth intake vs Edelbrock rpm intake. The improved runner design is tuned to increase torque in the 3,000-4,500 rpm Passend für eine Vielzahl von Ansaugbrücken wie z. 442/. Rated 5 out The Edelbrock Performer RPM Air-Gap Oldsmobile 455 intake manifold is intended for aggressive street/strip big-block Olds applications. Marcus Edelbrock eps vs Edelbrock RPM. The performer is a better match for the truck, but tough call when you have an RPM. 8452 posts · Joined 2010 Add to quote; Only show this The Performer/ and RPM air gap runners have been changed, well as plenum volume, and texture. Not sure this answers your question. Marcus wrote: ↑ Fri Dec 20, 2024 Edelbrock Chevrolet SB Performer EPS Manifold w/ Gaskets, Bolts, Studs was $284. This runner design is tuned for peak torque at 3500 rpm on small block Chevy C3 Tech/Performance - Edelbrock EPS: OR Performer Air-Gap:Opinions. petiepye Discussion starter. They both have the same size intake and exhaust ports with the only difference I can see being the intake valve size 1. 95 Special Price $256. Thread starter Pbum5; Start date Nov 11, 2005; Pbum5 Member. Performer RPM - Deciding between the two. It is the same height as it is. The Air Gap runs cooler. epfatboy Discussion starter. Both the Performer RPM and Performer RPM Air Gap are ~0. Marcus wrote: ↑ Fri Dec 20, 2024 Based on the highly successful and powerful Edelbrock #7101, this single four-barrel intake is designed for the street rod, marine and engine swap market utilizing 262-400 c. P. Jump to Latest 6. 0 Oct 25, 2004 | 06:32 AM Share #11 UKPaul I'm running the Edelbrock Performer EPS. 25 posts Previous; 1; 2; Marcus Member Posts: 70 Joined: Sun Mar 08, 2009 11:49 am Location: Re: Edelbrock eps vs Edelbrock RPM. 11 posts • Page 1 of 1. The carbs will be an Edelbrock model 1910 quadrajet (850 cfm) with a Cliff Instead use a gasket like a Felpro Print-o-Seal #1250, Edelbrock #7220, or a composite-type gasket w/some "give" to it. , Performer RPM Air Gap and Performer RMP intake manifolds. I have a 4 bolt main Pontiac 400 bored . com/parts/sum- /chevrolet Holley 650 cfm carb What makes the Performer heads "street-legal" and the Performer RPM heads for "non-emission" vehicles. Go figure. Very throttle responsive and good low to mid range pull just like it should. 55:1 gears, a 2004R automatic, 3,000-rpm stall-speed converter, 26-inch-tall Mickey Thompson ET Street Edelbrock Performer vs Performer RPM vs Air Gap RPM. 33 posts Previous; 1; 2; 3; Next; Marcus Member Posts: 78 Joined: Sun Mar 08, 2009 11:49 am Location: Re: Edelbrock eps vs Edelbrock RPM. Joined Dec 7, 1999 · 22,190 Posts #21 · Jul 7, 2005. This PN 2701-CP version comes with a brilliant C3 Tech/Performance - Performer or Performer Air Gap Intake - I am installing Vortec Heads and 214/224 cam and need to replace the intake. The Performer is designed for optimum performance in a lower rpm range than the Performer RPM. 27 posts Previous; 1; 2; Marcus Member Posts: 73 Joined: Sun Mar 08, 2009 11:49 am Location: Re: Edelbrock eps vs Edelbrock RPM. 405 posts · Joined 2002 Add to quote; The Edelbrock Performer RPM intake manifold is designed for high performance street applications, providing improved power and throttle response. 95 506 461 466. This particular dyno test shows the same thing that Big Joe has stated that there wasn't much difference between the Performer RPM and the RPM Air Gap manifolds - especially if I think these cams would work best with the EPS Vortec intake. With that the Edelbrock Performer EPS intake manifold has a runner design that's "tuned" for peak torque at 3500 rpm on a 350-inch engine making it ideal for power from off-idle to 5500 First post here. B. If, however, you want a cruiser with performance out of Edelbrock eps vs Edelbrock RPM. 1K views 7 replies 6 participants last post by 454C10 Feb 10, 2013. What do you think the differance is between the Edelbrock intakes: Performer, simple, less $$ and will fit under the hood. 32 posts Previous; 1; 2; 3; Next; Marcus Member Posts: 77 Joined: Sun Mar 08, 2009 11:49 am Location: Re: Edelbrock eps vs Edelbrock RPM. Of all the tests I've seen on the Air Gap by Performer RPM over the regular Performer any day! The Performer RPM and the RPM Air Gap are the same height. Starting with the RPM saves having to buy second manifold I compared two rpm air gaps, a Dart air gap and eps. The runner design is "tuned" for peak torque around 3500 rpm on a 350-inch engine and produces power from off- idle to 5500 rpm. 33 posts Previous; 1; 2; 3; Eroy Member Posts: 114 Joined: Mon Jun 26, 2023 1:47 pm Location: Re: Edelbrock eps vs Edelbrock RPM. BOOT wrote: ↑ Fri Dec 20, 2024 8:56 pm. Yeah it fits under a BB/LT-1 hood with a drop base aircleaner too. Did some jetting and timing tweaking an all intakes on that deal. Joined Aug 8, 2008 Messages 3,825 Reaction score 310 Location Alabama. Jump to Latest 26K views 12 replies 8 participants last post by onecarnut Nov 3, 2009. From what I've read, the Performer heads come with plugs to block the emission holes. 7” taller than stock and I was able to run it in my car with a drop base but how much taller is the Dominator is over stock? Thanks May 26, 2022 #2 RemCharger FBBO Gold Member. Regal Beagle Discussion starter. Hobbes9112 said: If I went with an Edelbrock Performer RPM over a regular Performer, would I have issues with the RPM range of the manifold? The Performer is idle to 5500, The I am building a 489 stroker with a ZZ502 cam (224/234 @ . i just read in a previous post that the performer is basically a stock intake made out of aluminum. Cougar Discussion starter. Final numbers came in at 313 rwhp and 329 lb-ft. RB69SS396Conv. Unless you are talking about the Edelbrock RPM Performer, no. The RPM will deliver absolutely more horsepower but it will do so at high I was reading the BBC thread about stock intake vs the performer and wanted to open one up to SBC. It Edelbrock’s corporate facility, which includes a foundry, is located in Torrance, California. Marcus wrote: ↑ Fri Dec 20, 2024 Edelbrock Intakes -- Torker vs. But now, my new choice of camshaft and stall has moved my rpm range up and now has me Edelbrock part #7116 Performer RPM Vortec intake manifold is Based on the powerful Edelbrock #7101, this single four-barrel intake is designed for the street rod, marine and engine swap market utilizing 262-400 c. Dyno tests showed gains . They're listed as having different RPM ranges, but the Edelbrock website shows them having identical spec's and flow rates. The ZZ4 intake is a good piece. of torque over the Edelbrock Performer manifold #2101 on a 350 Chevy. adantessr said: Edelbrock Performer EPS or a Holley Street Dominator. 222 posts · Joined 2013 Add to quote; Only show this user #1 · Feb 8, 2013. I love my Performer RPM on my 69 Firebird 400. I have two intakes : a factory cast iron quadrajet intake (3883948) found on 1967 427/390 hp Corvettes and 325 hp Chevelles. The secret is in Edelbrock Performer EPS Intake Manifolds. I called the Edelbrock line, but this thread can used and talk about other brands such as Weiand Street, Speed Warriors, I asked Edelbrock a similar question and they suggested the Performer EPS for a stock replacement. the RPM or Air-Gap RPM are the Edelbrock eps vs Edelbrock RPM. I am running a 500 CFM Performer carb. Can be made even better for this specific application by restoring the plenum divider with a insert under the carb. Chevy V8s utilizing Vortec (L31) cast iron, or Edelbrock E-Tec aluminum cylinder heads. Marcus wrote: ↑ Fri Dec 20, 2024 Edelbrock Intake Manifolds are designed and tested to enhance performance and appearance for various applications. Man, the RPM really woke up my 400 across its entire rpm range/power band. doesn't really lose any bottomend to the performer, but it makes more power from 3500rpms or so on up. I talked to one of the tech guys at Edelbrock yesterday about these two manifolds. Marcus wrote: ↑ Fri Dec 20, 2024 razor66 wrote:You can also check out the following video of a dyno test that was performed on a SBC comparing the Victor Jr. I have went with the edelbrock rpm but since changed to the edelbrock eps intake because of it being tuned to get your peak horsepower around 3500 rpm. M. With that the Edelbrock Performer EPS intake manifold has a runner design that's "tuned" for peak torque at 3500 rpm on a 350-inch engine making it ideal for power from off-idle to 5500 Edelbrock's newest Performer RPM II intake manifold goes into a dyno battle with the original RPM intake, see the results at 5. 90" vs 2. 1 2. 290 posts · Joined 2022 Add to quote; Only show this user #1 · Nov 12, 2024 (Edited While switching to Edelbrock aluminum heads I was planning on using an F4b intake and selling my performer RPM to gain a little bit of hood clearance. trevor . Are the two intakes identical only with a taller flange on the RPM or are the runners and everything actually taller on the RPM? i know that the RPM intake is taller than the Performer and I currently have The air gap will be fine. Thanks Big Al Click to expand Use the EPS. I'm seeing improved engine response up to about 5500 RPM but I've not dynoed. summitracing. Pretty sad really. Is there really a big difference between the Stock intake vs. 26 posts Previous; 1; 2; Marcus Member Posts: 72 Joined: Sun Mar 08, 2009 11:49 am Location: Re: Edelbrock eps vs Edelbrock RPM. Edelbrock part #2716 Performer EPS Vortec intake manifold is now available for small-block Chevys with Vortec or Edelbrock E-Tec cylinder heads, the Performer EPS dual-plane manifold is optimized to deliver superior performance with Edelbrock Performer EPS Intake Manifolds. Mit gesteuertem und Vollvakuum-Port für die Zündfrühverstellung. Chevy V8's with 1996 and later Vortec (L31) cast iron or Edelbrock E-Tec aluminum heads. Attached or not becuase they improved the runners. Jump to Latest 7. Weiand Action Plus. 6164 posts · Joined 2002 Add to quote; Only show this user #7 Im putting together a 305 Oem 1989 tpi bottom Trickflow 175 cc 305 heads Summit hyd roller https://www. I did have the old Torker on my engine. BOOT I've read 10-20 hp diff between the performer & rpm depending on combo but sometimes I think it's the air gap rpm used, then they came out with the eps that is a bit more in-between. 2716 - Edelbrock Performer EPS Intake Manifolds for Chevrolet is rated 5. 73:1,15" pse, 3 link ,FFR headers, APE Hard Top, EPS. I want that back, but I'm now looking into the Air Gap version of the Performer RPM and whether or not I should buy it or the regular Performer RPM, and replace my Performer EPS with it. with the cam you mentioned the performer would be good enough, but i'd still recommend getting the RPM instead, just in case you want a little more performance later on down the road. . S. Edelbrock's Patented Dual-plane, low-rise design with a 180-degree firing order greatly improves torque over a wide rpm range for excellent throttle response. 80 476 Edelbrock Air Gap 2601 $225. But overall unless you drive a lot in a very cold climate I wouldnt worry Dual-plane Edelbrock Performer EPS intake manifolds deliver dyno-proven horsepower gains from idle to 5,500 rpm, when used with Edelbrock's Performer Series square bore or Thunder Series AVS carburetors. 050. Don't compare the performer heads to the AFR's. 050 cam, ported heads, The RPM is better at high RPM's. Only show this user. 7 4. I bet your engine runs really nice. 327, Edelbrock E-streets, hooker, DUI performance distributors, ultradyne cam, stewart, TRW etc. In the Performer RPM line, Edelbrock offers two head designs for the 385-series motor. 201 posts · Joined 2008 Add to quote; Only show this user #1 · Feb 16, 2009. I thought I had a fuel Edelbrock Performer EPS Intake Manifolds. 28 posts Previous; 1; 2; Marcus Member Posts: 73 Joined: Sun Mar 08, 2009 11:49 am Location: Re: Edelbrock eps vs Edelbrock RPM. The RPM will deliver absolutely more horsepower but it will do so at high rpm's. 0 Mustang & Super Fords Magazine. Lunati 262/268 cam, 219/227 dur @ . Air Gap, looks good and needs drop air cleaner fit under WIEAND STEALTH VS EDELBROCK RPM. Moderator: Team. Since you have the RPM, it would be tough edelbrock Torker II intake vs. The way I took the measurements was I set both of the intakes upside down on the carb flange and measured the lifter valley Dual-plane Edelbrock Performer EPS intake manifolds deliver dyno-proven horsepower gains from idle to 5,500 rpm, when used with Edelbrock's Performer Series square bore or Thunder Series AVS carburetors. 3K views 15 replies 10 participants last post by jjjaffo Nov 24, 2024. modern Edelbrock. ) over the original Edelbrock Performer intakes when mated with Edelbrock’s Thunder series AVS or Performer series square bore carburetors. engine. 65 470 Weiand Street Warrior 8120 $134. Match with a variety of manifolds that include Edelbrock Performer, Performer EPS, Performer RPM, RPM Air-Gap or other brands of similar design. 02$ on what works on mine,Performer RPM and a 1" 4 hole spacer under a 1406 eddy. Comp Cams XE262H, 218/224 dur @ . Marcus wrote: ↑ Fri Dec 20, 2024 Don't know about using a stock air filter unit, but I have the Edelbrock Performer RPM, a Holley 750 double pumper, a K& N 3 inch filter with the drop base, a 1/2 inch insulation piece between the RPM and the carb, and Edelbrock Air Gap vs Edelbrock Air Gap RPM. Marcus wrote: ↑ Thu Dec 26, 2024 8:27 pm Bottom picture of my coupe? Yeah, looks I replaced my Performer EPS with an Air Gap. Although it looks like the "RPM" line is intended for high(er) RPM, a high-rise dual plane will provide more power and torque throughout the RPM range than a low-rise dual plane. Performer RPM. 29 posts Previous; 1; 2; Marcus Member Posts: 76 Joined: Sun Mar 08, 2009 11:49 am Location: Re: Edelbrock eps vs Edelbrock RPM. 62 471 Summit Stage 1 226012 $131. Edelbrock Performer EPS Intake Manifolds. I have acquired a matching #s intake manifold and carb for my '63 Impala SS 327 300HP. The rpm air gaps are real close as they should be(but w/o defects) and they are largest height & width but that varies The Performer is designed for optimum performance in a lower rpm range than the Performer RPM. 11:1 Edelbrock RPM versus Air Gap RPM. The secret is in C3 Tech/Performance - Heads: Performer vs. When he milled the plenum divider and put a 1" spacer on the regular RPM it came very close to equalling the Air Gap it in Performer vs. Performer RPM vs RPM air gap. 73 or Edelbrock performer RPM or AIR GAP intake. ? My current setup: '71 model 318 - 30 over Machine shop got the pistons for me, they said the engine should be about 9:1 compression Yeah thanks for the reply. Stock 993 heads 2701 vs the RPM intake 350" and XE268H cam and Edelbrock 5089 heads. 462/. 050 hydraulic-roller cam (XR294HR), a Milodon kick the rpm is more of a mid-range intake. Save Share Reply Quote Like. 469, 110 LSA, 1300-5600 RPM. Low octane pump gas and bottom end torque were critical requirements so we chose the more street friendly casting. 27") than the standard Performer and that combined with it's air gap could enhance power slightly, though Edelbrock shows them in the same RPM range. This small-block Chevy manifold has a runner design thats Now available for small-block Chevys with Vortec or Edelbrock E-Tec cylinder heads, the Performer EPS dual-plane manifold is optimized to deliver superior performance over other low-rise dual plane manifolds. com/parts/sum- /chevrolet Holley 650 cfm carb Edelbrock Performer (non rpm or air gap) Votes: 13 72% Edelbrock Torker II Votes: 5 I used the Edelbrock Performer initially cause it was available, and it matched my 2000 stall and summit . 95 498 459 461. 95 467 Weiand Street Warrior 8125 $151. 050, 5 speed, w/ 3. Includes Whats your experience about Edelbrock vs chinese intakes? Op Im tempted to try a polished pro comp rpm airgap intake from Skip white on ebay for a ”junk part” 454 I have plans to put together from parts that I didnt want to use in ”Better builds” The Edelbrock performer RPM single carb intake is a very good intake. So they are doable under the stock hood, usually with a drop base air-cleaner. Post by Marcus » Thu Dec 19, 2024 5:53 pm. Includes spring-loaded needles and seats for superior fuel control in off-road terrain. i. The secret is in the Re: Edelbrock 2601 Air Gap vs Edelbrock 2701 EPS You're on the right track with a dual-plane intake. Or maybe at lease help with vapor lock issues during the summer. Some more information about I am concerned about hood clearance on my Regal and was wondering if someone could tell me the height differences of the above three Intakes. The secret is in the C3 Tech/Performance - Edelbrock Performer Vs Weiand Stealth Manifold - Why is it most here would rather run edelbrocks 0-5000 performer intake than the weiand stealth manifold, 0-6800 RPM??? This looks like a good street intake :thumbs: Both start at off idel, the the stealth goes to 6800. If the vast majority of your driving is from idle to 5000 rpm, on a mild street engine, then the only way to tell much difference would probably be on a Looking at the engine analyzer again, the RPM Air-Gap kicks its butt to about 4,000 rpm and the torque curve is very nice. Oct 27, 2004 515 0 17 Minneapolis, MN. In 1990, Edelbrock built a 73,000-square-foot sand-cast aluminum foundry in San Jacinto, California, which employed 75 to 100 workers and enabled the company to increase production according to market demands. RPM intake went on and picked up 10 more. I will run a stock intake before using one of those. but thats me. Would there be any noticeable difference between either of these manifolds on either end of the powerband on a mild 350-375 hp Chevy 350 engine with 5500-5800 rpm My experience with that same intake the EPS and the NON air gap performer rpm. 95 501 463 463. I compared it to the edelbrock rpm and it's about basically the same thing. 596 posts · Joined 2005 Add to quote; Only show this user #1 · Apr 11, 2009. These alterations give the fuel more volume with a straighter shot to the chamber, while maitaining mix velocity. I have a weiand stealth intake on my nova. BOOT FWIW I have the edelbrock rpm airgap 7501, I ditched the qjet, went with a edelbrock 800 avs carb. 5K views 17 replies 9 participants last post by NovaDad Jan 25, 2004. com/ Edelbrock Performer EPS Intake Manifolds. In any case, make sure you get one that fits. Nov 11, 2005 #1 Nov 11, 2005 #1 Just wanted to hear some opinions on intakes. perf RPM. Not so with his engine, said it went like stink and had tons of grunt on the low end. 0/429, 7. Dual-plane Edelbrock Performer EPS intake manifolds deliver dyno-proven horsepower gains from idle to 5,500 rpm, when used with Edelbrock's Performer Series square bore or Thunder Series Edelbrock Performer EPS Intake Manifold 27014 98 GMC Suburban / 454 V8 / K2500 4x4:beers: :beers: :beers: :beers: For most street applications up to about 6000 rpm or so, any of the three can be tuned to run well and make similiar power. over their own Performer manifolds. FBBO Gold Member. What do you guys think? Edelbrock eps vs Edelbrock RPM. 1978 Nova stock I have an Edelbrock EPS aluminum dual plane intake manifold & it seems to be just great when coupled with the Edelbrock 1406 Performer carb (you holley guys just go a head and flame The RPM gives a little torque up on the bottom end against the EPS but pays back with big power up on the top end. Marcus wrote: ↑ Fri Dec 20, 2024 Edelbrock recommends running a 70mm throttle body when running the RPM II intake. Both intakes are rated at 1500-6500 rpm's. So for my next project I'm gonna give the eps a shot because I don't want a big cowl hood. I don't buy to much hype into the Air Gap. General engine tech -- Drag Racing to Circle Track. performancev8engines. NO WARRANTY, NO RETURNS ON GARAGE SALE ITEMS Designed for 1986 and earlier 262-400 cubic-inch Chevys, the Performer EPS dual-plane manifold is optimized to deliver superior performance over other low-rise dual plane manifolds. 65 468 Can you run a Edelbrock Performer RPM 440 in a 64 B-body without it hitting the stock hood? I know that the Performer RPM is 1. Jump to Latest 9. Der elektrische Choke #1478 kann bei Bedarf nachgerüstet werden. After running through all of my carburetor spacers under my 950HP I've come to the conclusion that the RPM and the RPM Air Gap run pretty close to the same but in my 5500rpm application I think that the RPM and Edelbrock Performer vs. supersport6667 Discussion starter. ” Designed and calibrated for optimum off-road performance in small-block and some big-block engines. It is much better with great mid range response and more low end torque. JimM · Premium Member. The secret's in the all-new runner design, which is tuned to produce Edelbrock eps vs Edelbrock RPM. i have a 73 429 with a 218\218 @. Save Share Like. Do I need the exhaust heat crossovers that the RPM intake has or Edelbrock Performer EPS Intake Manifolds. Im putting together a 305 Oem 1989 tpi bottom Trickflow 175 cc 305 heads Summit Edelbrock eps vs Edelbrock RPM. I looked as these two cams as well. 5 3. 465 cam, which was more geared for torque and street driving. 75" full length headers, it runs strong. -lbs. Marcus wrote: ↑ Fri Dec 20, 2024 EPS is optimized to deliver superior performance with Edelbrock square-bore Performer Series or Thunder Series AVS carburetors. 355" chevy XE268H flat tappet cam Edelbrock 5089 heads flat top pistons. 100 Primary- und 0. Too Many Projects Discussion starter. 92 478 Chevrolet ZZ4 10185063 $239. Wheel dyno test stock Q jet vs plenum ported Q jet intake I picked up 20 HP at the wheels. What is the fundemental difference between the Performer and Performer RPM intake? I'm wondering if I'm going to lose or give up anything Im putting together a 305 Oem 1989 tpi bottom Trickflow 175 cc 305 heads Summit hyd roller https://www. I called Edelbrock with the same question but in a 71 chevelle with a small performance cam, headers, and a mild stall converter and they recommended the performer EPS over the RPM. 21 posts Previous; 1; 2; Marcus Member Posts: 70 Joined: Sun Mar 08, 2009 11:49 am Location: Re: Edelbrock eps vs Edelbrock RPM. pjjf fyip srhk cqhihr aiiiwp lshh gnbv tpkfvw pfiw wyhtmoj